Reconcile upgrade notes in master #2103
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Jan Høydahl <janhoy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Høydahl <janhoy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Høydahl <janhoy@apache.org>
…er all :) Signed-off-by: Jan Høydahl <janhoy@apache.org>
ctargett
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2020
ctargett
pushed a commit
to ctargett/lucene-solr
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2020
inspired by And fixes apache#2102
epugh
pushed a commit
to epugh/lucene-solr-1
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2021
inspired by And fixes apache#2102
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The upgrade notes in ref-guide tends to sometimes be updated in 8.x branches only and not synced to master branch.
This is an attempt, (inspired by and fixes #2102). I diffed the
branch_8xversion with master and saw that the 8x wording in most cases was more up to date. I tried to make sure that the updates are valid for 9.x, and skipped a few refguide links that I I believe may have been since removed, but have not tried to compile the refguide to detect its validity.