New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MNG-8081] interpolate available properties during default profile selection (Maven 3.9.x) #1447
base: maven-3.9.x
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
f36d41c
to
4c93af5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we ensure the alignment on v4 before working on v3 🙏 ?
@Inject | ||
private List<ProfileActivator> activators = new ArrayList<>(); | ||
|
||
@Inject | ||
private ModelInterpolator interpolator = new ModelInterpolator() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Inject
= new? 🤔
}; | ||
model.setProfiles(original.stream().map(activatableProfile).collect(Collectors.toList())); | ||
|
||
ModelBuildingRequest mbr = new DefaultModelBuildingRequest() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
guess it would be saner to use the actual loaded model we already have at that time and avoid asProperties
too since request is already there
can be done in DefaultModelBuilder
probably
side note: we must somehow align it on master
and not create a behavior in v3 which is different from v4 so for me ensuring v4 behavior (merge) and impl alignment is a prerequisite to this PR.
.interpolateModel(model, context.getProjectDirectory(), mbr, problem -> {}) | ||
.getProfiles(); | ||
|
||
return model.getProfiles().stream().collect(Collectors.toMap(Profile::getId, UnaryOperator.identity())); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
identity belongs to Function IIRC
maven-model-builder/pom.xml
Outdated
@@ -87,6 +87,11 @@ under the License. | |||
<artifactId>xmlunit-matchers</artifactId> | |||
<scope>test</scope> | |||
</dependency> | |||
<dependency> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🙏 why mocking there? this is a hell anywhere in maven code base and ultimately the related tests are useless in general so let's try to avoid it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is wrong imho, the interpolation should be done in the ModelBuilder
during profile activation interpolation
Sounds like this approach would keep the v3/v4 impls more similar. I'll work on this. |
…lection (Maven 3.9.x)
Using the available
ModelInterpolator
, evaluate profile activations after having interpolated any embedded property constructs among configurations of activations only.Following this checklist to help us incorporate your
contribution quickly and easily:
for the change (usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not
require a JIRA issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without
pulling in other changes.
[MNG-XXX] SUMMARY
,where you replace
MNG-XXX
andSUMMARY
with the appropriate JIRA issue.[MNG-XXX] SUMMARY
.Best practice is to use the JIRA issue title in both the pull request title and in the first line of the commit message.
mvn clean verify
to make sure basic checks pass. A more thorough check willbe performed on your pull request automatically.
If your pull request is about ~20 lines of code you don't need to sign an
Individual Contributor License Agreement if you are unsure
please ask on the developers list.
To make clear that you license your contribution under
the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
you have to acknowledge this by using the following check-box.
I hereby declare this contribution to be licenced under the Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004
In any other case, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.
ICLA on file