Made the order of EXPECT_CALL()s match the expected order of events.

Review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40721
apache · Nov 29, 2015 · 5820cd3 · 5820cd3
1 parent b2b0eed
commit 5820cd3
Showing 1 changed file with 6 additions and 6 deletions.
diff --git a/src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp b/src/tests/reservation_endpoints_tests.cpp
@@ -147,11 +147,11 @@ TEST_F(ReservationEndpointsTest, AvailableResources)
 
   Future<vector<Offer>> offers;
 
+  EXPECT_CALL(sched, registered(&driver, _, _));
+
   EXPECT_CALL(sched, resourceOffers(&driver, _))
     .WillOnce(FutureArg<1>(&offers));
 
-  EXPECT_CALL(sched, registered(&driver, _, _));
-
   driver.start();
 
   AWAIT_READY(offers);
@@ -237,11 +237,11 @@ TEST_F(ReservationEndpointsTest, ReserveOfferedResources)
 
   Future<vector<Offer>> offers;
 
+  EXPECT_CALL(sched, registered(&driver, _, _));
+
   EXPECT_CALL(sched, resourceOffers(&driver, _))
     .WillOnce(FutureArg<1>(&offers));
 
-  EXPECT_CALL(sched, registered(&driver, _, _));
-
   driver.start();
 
   AWAIT_READY(offers);
@@ -319,11 +319,11 @@ TEST_F(ReservationEndpointsTest, UnreserveOfferedResources)
 
   Future<vector<Offer>> offers;
 
+  EXPECT_CALL(sched, registered(&driver, _, _));
+
   EXPECT_CALL(sched, resourceOffers(&driver, _))
     .WillOnce(FutureArg<1>(&offers));
 
-  EXPECT_CALL(sched, registered(&driver, _, _));
-
   driver.start();
 
   AWAIT_READY(offers);