Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[refactor][client] Remove useless locks in batch receiving #18005

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 13, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
Expand Up @@ -38,8 +38,6 @@
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLongFieldUpdater;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
import lombok.Getter;
import lombok.Setter;
import org.apache.pulsar.client.api.BatchReceivePolicy;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -95,7 +93,6 @@ public abstract class ConsumerBase<T> extends HandlerState implements Consumer<T
.newUpdater(ConsumerBase.class, "incomingMessagesSize");
protected volatile long incomingMessagesSize = 0;
protected volatile Timeout batchReceiveTimeout = null;
protected final Lock reentrantLock = new ReentrantLock();

protected static final AtomicLongFieldUpdater<ConsumerBase> CONSUMER_EPOCH =
AtomicLongFieldUpdater.newUpdater(ConsumerBase.class, "consumerEpoch");
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -910,13 +907,7 @@ protected void notifyPendingBatchReceivedCallBack() {
if (opBatchReceive == null) {
return;
}

reentrantLock.lock();
try {
notifyPendingBatchReceivedCallBack(opBatchReceive.future);
} finally {
reentrantLock.unlock();
}
notifyPendingBatchReceivedCallBack(opBatchReceive.future);
}

private boolean hasNextBatchReceive() {
Expand Down