[fix][client] Fix update response body text

[tuteng]

Fixes #xyz

Master Issue: #xyz

Motivation

When using pulsar-admin and encountering an exception, first check the body, then check the http text

Modifications

• Update http response body check

Verifying this change

• Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

• Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
• Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

• Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
• The public API
• The schema
• The default values of configurations
• The threading model
• The binary protocol
• The REST endpoints
• The admin CLI options
• Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

• doc
• doc-required
• doc-not-needed
• doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository: AmateurEvents#31

[github-actions]

@tuteng Please add the following content to your PR description and select a checkbox:

- [ ] `doc` <!-- Your PR contains doc changes -->
- [ ] `doc-required` <!-- Your PR changes impact docs and you will update later -->
- [ ] `doc-not-needed` <!-- Your PR changes do not impact docs -->
- [ ] `doc-complete` <!-- Docs have been already added -->

[mattisonchao]

LGTM, We need to see if we break unit test.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #18794 (63e4b48) into master (99e26f5) will decrease coverage by 7.62%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #18794      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     44.79%   37.16%   -7.63%     
+ Complexity    10026     6977    -3049     
============================================
  Files           703      623      -80     
  Lines         68808    59099    -9709     
  Branches       7375     6146    -1229     
============================================
- Hits          30822    21967    -8855     
+ Misses        34378    34294      -84     
+ Partials       3608     2838     -770     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	37.16% <0.00%> (-7.63%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...he/pulsar/client/impl/MultiTopicsConsumerImpl.java	22.78% <0.00%> (-0.20%)	⬇️
...ava/org/apache/pulsar/broker/admin/v1/Brokers.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...va/org/apache/pulsar/broker/admin/v1/Clusters.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
.../org/apache/pulsar/broker/admin/v1/Properties.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...ar/common/naming/PartitionedManagedLedgerInfo.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...naming/RangeEquallyDivideBundleSplitAlgorithm.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...e/pulsar/broker/admin/impl/ResourceQuotasBase.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-96.43%)	⬇️
...he/pulsar/broker/service/AnalyzeBacklogResult.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-92.31%)	⬇️
.../apache/pulsar/broker/admin/v1/ResourceQuotas.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-91.43%)	⬇️
...e/pulsar/broker/stats/AllocatorStatsGenerator.java	0.00% <0.00%> (-91.38%)	⬇️
... and 244 more

[Jason918]

When using pulsar-admin and encountering an exception, first check the body, then check the http text

Can you give an actual case this PR is solving?

[tuteng]

When using pulsar-admin and encountering an exception, first check the body, then check the http text

Can you give an actual case this PR is solving?

https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/web/ExceptionHandler.java#L46

This needs an interceptor and then throws an exception with a custom message, using pulsar-admin to execute the corresponding command, which never gets the custom message @Jason918

[mattisonchao]

Oops. Could you help to take a look? I am not sure if it is a sensitive breaking change for users.

@codelipenghui @eolivelli @Technoboy- @Jason918