Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

During Function update, cleanup should only happen for temp files that were generated #7201

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 10, 2020

Conversation

srkukarni
Copy link
Contributor

(If this PR fixes a github issue, please add Fixes #<xyz>.)

Fixes #

(or if this PR is one task of a github issue, please add Master Issue: #<xyz> to link to the master issue.)

Master Issue: #

Motivation

When doing function updates, cleanup should only be done for files that were temporarily created.

Modifications

Describe the modifications you've done.

Verifying this change

  • Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If yes was chosen, please highlight the changes

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API: (yes / no)
  • The schema: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The default values of configurations: (yes / no)
  • The wire protocol: (yes / no)
  • The rest endpoints: (yes / no)
  • The admin cli options: (yes / no)
  • Anything that affects deployment: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
  • If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
  • If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding the documentation

@srkukarni srkukarni added this to the 2.7.0 milestone Jun 8, 2020
@srkukarni srkukarni self-assigned this Jun 8, 2020
&& componentPackageFile != null && componentPackageFile.exists()) {
componentPackageFile.delete();
if (componentPackageFile != null && componentPackageFile.exists()) {
if ((functionPkgUrl != null && !functionPkgUrl.startsWith(Utils.FILE)) || uploadedInputStream != null) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we also need to exclude "http" ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to add this for sources and sinks as well?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no. Only file. Since for http(or others) we will make a copy and do validation on that copy. We need to cleanup this copy.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch about sources/sinks. Will add

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added the same logic for sources/sinks

@srkukarni srkukarni merged commit 828d033 into apache:master Jun 10, 2020
@srkukarni srkukarni deleted the update_file_fix branch June 10, 2020 01:11
merlimat pushed a commit to merlimat/pulsar that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2020
…t were generated (apache#7201)

* Fix logic while updating functions. Cleanup should only happen for temp files that were generated

* Fix integration tests

* Fix test

* Fix logic for parallelism > 1

* Fix test

* Address comments

Co-authored-by: Sanjeev Kulkarni <sanjeevk@splunk.com>
huangdx0726 pushed a commit to huangdx0726/pulsar that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2020
…t were generated (apache#7201)

* Fix logic while updating functions. Cleanup should only happen for temp files that were generated

* Fix integration tests

* Fix test

* Fix logic for parallelism > 1

* Fix test

* Address comments

Co-authored-by: Sanjeev Kulkarni <sanjeevk@splunk.com>
zymap pushed a commit to streamnative/pulsar-archived that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2020
…t were generated (apache#7201)

* Fix logic while updating functions. Cleanup should only happen for temp files that were generated

* Fix integration tests

* Fix test

* Fix logic for parallelism > 1

* Fix test

* Address comments

Co-authored-by: Sanjeev Kulkarni <sanjeevk@splunk.com>
@wolfstudy
Copy link
Member

needs to cherry-pick to 2.6.2.

wolfstudy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2020
…t were generated (#7201)

* Fix logic while updating functions. Cleanup should only happen for temp files that were generated

* Fix integration tests

* Fix test

* Fix logic for parallelism > 1

* Fix test

* Address comments

Co-authored-by: Sanjeev Kulkarni <sanjeevk@splunk.com>
(cherry picked from commit 828d033)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants