[MINOR][DOCS] Added Missing back slashes #11699
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Jenkins, this is ok to test. LGTM |
|
merged into master 1.6 |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? When studying spark many users just copy examples on the documentation and paste on their terminals and because of that the missing backlashes lead them run into some shell errors. The added backslashes avoid that problem for spark users with that behavior. ## How was this patch tested? I generated the documentation locally using jekyll and checked the generated pages Author: Daniel Santana <mestresan@gmail.com> Closes #11699 from danielsan/master. (cherry picked from commit 9f13f0f) Signed-off-by: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>
jeanlyn
pushed a commit
to jeanlyn/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? When studying spark many users just copy examples on the documentation and paste on their terminals and because of that the missing backlashes lead them run into some shell errors. The added backslashes avoid that problem for spark users with that behavior. ## How was this patch tested? I generated the documentation locally using jekyll and checked the generated pages Author: Daniel Santana <mestresan@gmail.com> Closes apache#11699 from danielsan/master.
roygao94
pushed a commit
to roygao94/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? When studying spark many users just copy examples on the documentation and paste on their terminals and because of that the missing backlashes lead them run into some shell errors. The added backslashes avoid that problem for spark users with that behavior. ## How was this patch tested? I generated the documentation locally using jekyll and checked the generated pages Author: Daniel Santana <mestresan@gmail.com> Closes apache#11699 from danielsan/master.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When studying spark many users just copy examples on the documentation and paste on their terminals
and because of that the missing backlashes lead them run into some shell errors.
The added backslashes avoid that problem for spark users with that behavior.
How was this patch tested?
I generated the documentation locally using jekyll and checked the generated pages