Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-9212][CORE] upgrade Netty version to 4.0.29.Final #7562

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

liyezhang556520
Copy link
Contributor

related JIRA: SPARK-9212 and SPARK-8101

@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Jul 21, 2015

I think this is fine based on previous discussion. Is there any additional change to make here? you say it makes it possible to avoid some memory-related hack? or is that inside netty?

@liyezhang556520
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe I made a misleading expression with "hack", I meant I didn't find a way to go into netty to get the memory usage for old versions since they didn't provide any public APIs.
And I think there is no additional change to make here.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jul 21, 2015

Test build #37922 has finished for PR 7562 at commit 1917729.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds the following public classes (experimental):
    • trait ExpectsInputTypes extends Expression
    • trait ImplicitCastInputTypes extends ExpectsInputTypes
    • trait Unevaluable extends Expression
    • trait Nondeterministic extends Expression
    • trait CodegenFallback extends Expression
    • case class Hex(child: Expression) extends UnaryExpression with ImplicitCastInputTypes
    • case class Unhex(child: Expression) extends UnaryExpression with ImplicitCastInputTypes

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 26ed22a Jul 23, 2015
@liyezhang556520 liyezhang556520 deleted the SPARK-9212 branch August 26, 2015 01:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants