Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify/restructure data stream generator #1258

Closed
bossenti opened this issue Feb 11, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1286
Closed

Simplify/restructure data stream generator #1258

bossenti opened this issue Feb 11, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1286
Assignees
Labels
python Pull requests that update Python code refactoring Indicates when a pull request or issue contains larger refactoring aspects.
Milestone

Comments

@bossenti
Copy link
Contributor

Body

Currently, Python's data stream generator is a bit complicated and not very lucid.
We need to think how we can structure it better.
One solution could be to use pydantics default functionalities.

StreamPipes Committer

I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache StreamPipes project.

@bossenti bossenti added python Pull requests that update Python code refactoring Indicates when a pull request or issue contains larger refactoring aspects. labels Feb 11, 2023
@bossenti bossenti added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Feb 11, 2023
@SvenO3 SvenO3 self-assigned this Feb 14, 2023
SvenO3 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 20, 2023
* Update data stream generator

* Fix data stream name

* Update default values
@bossenti bossenti modified the milestones: 1.0.0, 0.91.0 Mar 11, 2023
bossenti pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 11, 2023
* Update data stream generator

* Fix data stream name

* Update default values
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
python Pull requests that update Python code refactoring Indicates when a pull request or issue contains larger refactoring aspects.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants