Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

THRIFT-4839: Remove embedded buffering/framed options from TCP transp… #1770

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

THRIFT-4839: Remove embedded buffering/framed options from TCP transp… #1770

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ksmithdev
Copy link
Contributor

…orts

Client: netstd
Patch: Kyle Smith

Removed the embedded buffered/framed code from the socket and tls socket transports. I also updated the tests and tutorial files to use the existing TFramedTransport.Factory and TBufferedTransport.Factory classes.

  • Did you create an Apache Jira ticket? (not required for trivial changes)
  • Does your pull request title follow the pattern "THRIFT-NNNN: describe my issue"? (not required for trivial changes)
  • Did you squash your changes to a single commit?
  • Did you do your best to avoid breaking changes? If one was needed, did you label the Jira ticket with "Breaking-Change"

@ksmithdev
Copy link
Contributor Author

As I was working on this, I was wondering if "buffering" is the correct term. Would "mode" make more sense? As in transport mode?

@jeking3
Copy link
Contributor

jeking3 commented Mar 25, 2019

Separation of transport concepts is great to see.

Jens-G pushed a commit to Jens-G/thrift that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2019
…orts

Client: netstd
Patch: Kyle Smith + minor changes by Jens Geyer

This closes apache#1770
@Jens-G
Copy link
Member

Jens-G commented Mar 26, 2019

Looking at it ...

Re mode: "Buffering" may not be the best choice ever, but "mode"?

@Jens-G Jens-G closed this in 7b94dd4 Mar 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants