Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

THRIFT-5526: java gen to use private_members instead of private-members as a consistent param casing #2531

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jimexist
Copy link
Member

@jimexist jimexist commented Feb 22, 2022

java gen to use private_members instead of private-members as a consistent param casing

  • Did you create an Apache Jira ticket? (not required for trivial changes)
  • If a ticket exists: Does your pull request title follow the pattern "THRIFT-NNNN: describe my issue"?
  • Did you squash your changes to a single commit? (not required, but preferred)
  • Did you do your best to avoid breaking changes? If one was needed, did you label the Jira ticket with "Breaking-Change"?
  • If your change does not involve any code, include [skip ci] anywhere in the commit message to free up build resources.

@jimexist jimexist changed the title java gen to use private_members instead of private-members as a consistent param casing THRIFT-5526: java gen to use private_members instead of private-members as a consistent param casing Feb 22, 2022
@Jens-G
Copy link
Member

Jens-G commented Feb 22, 2022

You are being aware that you are about to introduce a breaking change? Proposal: Accept both forms.

Copy link
Member

@Jens-G Jens-G left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Proposal: Accept both forms.

@jimexist
Copy link
Member Author

Proposal: Accept both forms.

Hi @Jens-G thanks for the suggestion. in fact it's not a breaking change, as in https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/2531/files#diff-c59dffe78e4250a1f0450c496300e137aa1631b60488108e237a292a1c2e6789R81-R82 both forms are indeed accepted. however do you think i should include this information in the document (-help print out) instead?

@Jens-G Jens-G closed this in 4bd1fd8 Mar 2, 2022
@jimexist jimexist deleted the fix-private-members branch March 3, 2022 01:50
jimexist pushed a commit to jimexist/thrift that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2022
…a consistent param casing

Client: java
Patch: Jiayu Liu

This closes apache#2531
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants