Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TS-4709: Separate LogFilter expression parsing. #835

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 2, 2016

Conversation

jpeach
Copy link
Contributor

@jpeach jpeach commented Aug 2, 2016

Separate LogFilter expression parsing from the configuration file
parser so that it can be tested and reused in other contexts.

Separate LogFilter expression parsing from the configuration file
parser so that it can be tested and reused in other contexts.
@atsci
Copy link

atsci commented Aug 2, 2016

FreeBSD build successful! See https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-FreeBSD/496/ for details.

@atsci
Copy link

atsci commented Aug 2, 2016

Linux build successful! See https://ci.trafficserver.apache.org/job/Github-Linux/393/ for details.

@maskit
Copy link
Member

maskit commented Aug 2, 2016

👍

@zwoop zwoop added the Logging label Aug 2, 2016
@zwoop zwoop added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Aug 2, 2016
@zwoop
Copy link
Contributor

zwoop commented Aug 2, 2016

Seems clean, ship it.

@jpeach jpeach merged commit e2453f1 into apache:master Aug 2, 2016
@jpeach jpeach deleted the fix/TS-4709 branch August 16, 2016 15:52
bneradt pushed a commit to bneradt/trafficserver that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2024
the 4th parameter, KeyEqual, is missing in ConnectingIpPool declaration, which may lead to the comparison of two IpEndpoint object won't work as we expected. That is, the default one is unlikely to work with sockaddr type.
In another way, IpHelper contains the compare operator for IpEndpoint type, so IpHelper should be used as the KeyEqual parameter of ConnectingIpPoon declaration

further discussion could be found in https://ouryahoo.slack.com/archives/C6JQARF25/p1688459341022519
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants