Increase code coverage

[dunglas]

Q	A
Bug fix?	no
New feature?	no
BC breaks?	no
Deprecations?	no
Tests pass?	yes
Fixed tickets	n/a
License	MIT
Doc PR	n/a

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.4%) to 83.851% when pulling 2b6dd3c on dunglas:coverage into 0f7ec87 on api-platform:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.4%) to 83.851% when pulling fac1c7d on dunglas:coverage into 0f7ec87 on api-platform:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.4%) to 83.851% when pulling a56c3ff on dunglas:coverage into 0f7ec87 on api-platform:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 84.052% when pulling 42d1bb5 on dunglas:coverage into 0f7ec87 on api-platform:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 84.113% when pulling a26d621 on dunglas:coverage into 0f7ec87 on api-platform:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+1.02%) to 84.504% when pulling 35f1498 on dunglas:coverage into 0f7ec87 on api-platform:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+1.3%) to 84.75% when pulling 35f1498 on dunglas:coverage into 0f7ec87 on api-platform:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+1.6%) to 85.089% when pulling a394182 on dunglas:coverage into c605269 on api-platform:master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+4.1%) to 87.563% when pulling d63aa99 on dunglas:coverage into c605269 on api-platform:master.

[teohhanhui]

We really should enforce sorted dependencies so that we can stop mucking around with where they should "logically" be placed "correctly"... 😆