-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove @nonreactive
directives from queries passed to MockLink
#11845
Merged
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0b69d18
Remove client-only directives in MockLink
jerelmiller 2baa33d
Add ability to not remove client only directives in MockLink
jerelmiller cffe53b
Minor refactor to existing tests
jerelmiller 9e5d738
Add maxUsageCount to all tests
jerelmiller b08d5ad
Revert type signature closer to original function
jerelmiller 14f77f9
Remove stray console.log
jerelmiller 3be86e2
Remove nonreactive directive in normalizeMockedResponse
jerelmiller d386060
Remove removeClientOnlyDirectives option
jerelmiller afb2167
Revert type change for addTypename
jerelmiller f03b6fe
Add changeset
jerelmiller 1f0e897
Reorganize tests to better mimic actual usage
jerelmiller 207239f
Merge branch 'main' into jerel/issue-11781-mocklink-nonreactive
jerelmiller 1e48c56
Clean up Prettier, Size-limit, and Api-Extractor
jerelmiller File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
--- | ||
"@apollo/client": patch | ||
--- | ||
|
||
Remove `@nonreactive` directives from queries passed to `MockLink` to ensure they are properly matched. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a bit weird to me, because this would never be called like that in AC. Can you give me some insights into the intent here please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For these tests, I'm just trying to "prove" that the removal of the directives happen, so if we execute a query that matches the original (i.e. it still contains the directive), it won't match, hence this check.
What here is weird to you? Are you referring to the
execute
call here? Or something else?