Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(federation): Print @tag and @inaccessible directives conditionally #859

Conversation

trevor-scheer
Copy link
Member

Only print the directive definitions and @core declarations for the @tag and @inaccessible directives in the supergraph SDL if there are usages of them found in the subgraph schemas.

Copy link
Contributor

@martijnwalraven martijnwalraven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other than some comments about naming, this looks good to me!

/**
* A set of directive names that have been used at least once
*/
type AppliedDirectiveUsages = Set<string>;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not a blocker, but the term 'applied directive usages' is a bit weird because both 'applied directives' and 'directive usages' are meant to differentiate between directive definitions and their use.

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ import {
DirectiveNode,
} from 'graphql';
import { transformSchema } from 'apollo-graphql';
import apolloTypeSystemDirectives from '../directives';
import apolloTypeSystemDirectives, { appliedDirectives, federationDirectives } from '../directives';
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had missed this before, but appliedDirectives doesn't seem like the right name here, because these exports are directive definitions (as opposed to directive applications, which is what we find on AST nodes). Maybe something like otherKnownDirectives could work here?

@trevor-scheer
Copy link
Member Author

Noting the recommendations are strictly naming/internally facing related and I'm hoping to get in on a Rover release, I'm going to merge now and follow up with naming fixes today.

@trevor-scheer trevor-scheer merged commit 6eb9bef into release-federation-0.26.0 Jul 7, 2021
@trevor-scheer trevor-scheer deleted the trevor/print-tag-inaccessible-directives-conditionally branch July 7, 2021 15:57
@abernix
Copy link
Member

abernix commented Jul 7, 2021

@trevor-scheer agree with your decision to expedite and follow-up with the suggestions that @martijnwalraven offered. thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants