Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

align coprocessor metric creation #4930

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

align coprocessor metric creation #4930

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

Geal
Copy link
Contributor

@Geal Geal commented Apr 9, 2024

There are currently 2 different ways to create metrics, with slight incompatibilities. This makes sure that the execution stage coprocessor metrics are generated in the same way as the other stages


Checklist

Complete the checklist (and note appropriate exceptions) before the PR is marked ready-for-review.

  • Changes are compatible1
  • Documentation2 completed
  • Performance impact assessed and acceptable
  • Tests added and passing3
    • Unit Tests
    • Integration Tests
    • Manual Tests

Exceptions

Note any exceptions here

Notes

Footnotes

  1. It may be appropriate to bring upcoming changes to the attention of other (impacted) groups. Please endeavour to do this before seeking PR approval. The mechanism for doing this will vary considerably, so use your judgement as to how and when to do this.

  2. Configuration is an important part of many changes. Where applicable please try to document configuration examples.

  3. Tick whichever testing boxes are applicable. If you are adding Manual Tests, please document the manual testing (extensively) in the Exceptions.

There are currently 2 different ways to create metrics, with slight
incompatibilities. This makes sure that the execution stage coprocessor
metrics are generated in the same way as the other stages
@Geal Geal requested a review from a team April 9, 2024 12:41

This comment has been minimized.

@router-perf
Copy link

router-perf bot commented Apr 9, 2024

CI performance tests

  • reload - Reload test over a long period of time at a constant rate of users
  • events_big_cap_high_rate_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users, deduplication enabled and high rate event with a big queue capacity using callback mode
  • events_without_dedup_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication DISABLED using callback mode
  • large-request - Stress test with a 1 MB request payload
  • const - Basic stress test that runs with a constant number of users
  • no-graphos - Basic stress test, no GraphOS.
  • step-jemalloc-tuning - Clone of the basic stress test for jemalloc tuning
  • events - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication ENABLED
  • events_callback - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication ENABLED in callback mode
  • events_big_cap_high_rate - Stress test for events with a lot of users, deduplication enabled and high rate event with a big queue capacity
  • events_without_dedup - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication DISABLED
  • xxlarge-request - Stress test with 100 MB request payload
  • xlarge-request - Stress test with 10 MB request payload
  • step - Basic stress test that steps up the number of users over time

Copy link
Contributor

@BrynCooke BrynCooke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, we're trying to move away from the tracing macros for metrics. They cause a bunch of issues around types, they are slow and also they can't be unit tested. Can we move to the new macros?

There's docs for the new macros here: https://github.com/apollographql/router/blob/dev/dev-docs/metrics.md

@Geal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Geal commented Apr 9, 2024

the issue appeared because I tried to move to the new macros at the exectution stage. Do you want me to update the other stages instead?

@BrynCooke
Copy link
Contributor

BrynCooke commented Apr 10, 2024

Yeah let's try and yeet the other metrics macro use.

It's generally bad form to have multiple points where a metric is updated as with both the macros there is a risk of collision. The only reason it didn't hit us harder is that the old tracing macros didn't fill out the metric descriptions. In other areas of the code we also had issues with double counting.

Ideally we pull out a function that updates the metric and use this in all places in this plugin or alternatively use the regular meter provider to create the meter once and store it in the plugin for reuse at all current callsites.

@Geal Geal requested a review from BrynCooke April 12, 2024 15:25
@Geal Geal enabled auto-merge (squash) April 12, 2024 16:30
@Geal Geal merged commit 54d299a into dev Apr 12, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@Geal Geal deleted the geal/coprocessor-metrics branch April 12, 2024 16:43
@abernix abernix mentioned this pull request Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants