Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Explicit Module Builds] Remove logic for Swift-client-specific Clang module dependency jobs #1332

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 18, 2023

Conversation

artemcm
Copy link
Contributor

@artemcm artemcm commented Apr 17, 2023

We have moved towards a build model where the output of the dependency scanner is the canonical collection of modules that must be built. The driver's logic to generate potentially multiple examples of a given Clang dependency, with different command sets, as required per Swift client module in the build graph, is no longer valid - even module output paths are no longer determined by the driver. Remaining logic that is removed in this PR may result in mistakenly producing duplicate jobs for the same Clang PCM build job.

… module dependency jobs

We have moved towards a build model where the output of the dependency scanner is the canonical collection of modules that must be built. The driver's logic to generate potentially multiple examples of a given Clang dependency, with different command sets, as required per Swift client module in the build graph, is no longer valid - even module output paths are no longer determined by the driver. Remaining logic that is removed in this PR may result in mistakenly producing duplicate jobs for the same Clang PCM build job.
@artemcm artemcm requested a review from nkcsgexi April 17, 2023 23:48
@artemcm
Copy link
Contributor Author

artemcm commented Apr 17, 2023

@swift-ci test

@artemcm artemcm merged commit 151847c into apple:main Apr 18, 2023
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants