Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

README: make it easier for users to understand the implemented protocols #1304

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 13, 2019

Conversation

weissi
Copy link
Member

@weissi weissi commented Dec 13, 2019

Motivation:

Repeatedly, we learned that our users don't fully know which protocols
are and aren't implemented by SwiftNIO or SSWG projects.

Modifications:

Add a table of implemented protocols to the README.

Result:

Easier to access information.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Lukasa Lukasa added the patch-version-bump-only For PRs that when merged will only cause a bump of the patch version, ie. 1.0.x -> 1.0.(x+1) label Dec 13, 2019
@Lukasa Lukasa added this to the 2.12.0 milestone Dec 13, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@Lukasa Lukasa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One minor nit but this looks great.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Motivation:

Repeatedly, we learned that our users don't fully know which protocols
are and aren't implemented by SwiftNIO or SSWG projects.

Modifications:

Add a table of implemented protocols to the README.

Result:

Easier to access information.
@weissi weissi merged commit 1c3c8a0 into apple:master Dec 13, 2019
@weissi weissi deleted the jw-advertise-protocols branch December 13, 2019 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
patch-version-bump-only For PRs that when merged will only cause a bump of the patch version, ie. 1.0.x -> 1.0.(x+1)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants