Some refactors we did to make the linter agree with us more (Sourcery refactored) #111
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Co-Authored-By: Austin Abro <AustinAbro321> Co-Authored-By: Gregor Riegler <gregorriegler> Co-Authored-By: <chbndrhnns> Co-Authored-By: Bernhard Raml <SwamyDev>
Co-Authored-By: Austin Abro <AustinAbro321>
Co-Authored-By: Gregor Riegler <gregorriegler>
Co-Authored-By: <chbndrhnns>
Co-Authored-By: Bernhard Raml <SwamyDev>
Co-Authored-By: Austin Abro <AustinAbro321> Co-Authored-By: Gregor Riegler <gregorriegler> Co-Authored-By: <chbndrhnns> Co-Authored-By: Bernhard Raml <SwamyDev>
…class Co-Authored-By: Austin Abro <AustinAbro321> Co-Authored-By: Gregor Riegler <gregorriegler> Co-Authored-By: <chbndrhnns> Co-Authored-By: Bernhard Raml <SwamyDev>
Co-Authored-By: Austin Abro <AustinAbro321> Co-Authored-By: Gregor Riegler <gregorriegler> Co-Authored-By: <chbndrhnns> Co-Authored-By: Bernhard Raml <SwamyDev>
| extension_with_dot = "." + extension_with_dot | ||
| extension_with_dot = f".{extension_with_dot}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Function FileOptions.with_extension refactored with the following changes:
- Use f-string instead of string concatenation (
use-fstring-for-concatenation)
| if self.has_scrubber(): | ||
| return self.fields["scrubber_func"](data) | ||
| return data | ||
| return self.fields["scrubber_func"](data) if self.has_scrubber() else data |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Function Options.scrub refactored with the following changes:
- Lift code into else after jump in control flow (
reintroduce-else) - Replace if statement with if expression (
assign-if-exp)
Comment on lines
29
to
+34
| def get_class_name_for_frame(stacktrace: FrameInfo) -> str: | ||
| if "self" not in stacktrace[0].f_locals: | ||
| name = os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(stacktrace[1]))[0] | ||
| else: | ||
| name = f"{stacktrace[0].f_locals['self'].__class__.__name__}" | ||
| return name | ||
| return ( | ||
| os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(stacktrace[1]))[0] | ||
| if "self" not in stacktrace[0].f_locals | ||
| else f"{stacktrace[0].f_locals['self'].__class__.__name__}" | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Function StackFrameNamer.get_class_name_for_frame refactored with the following changes:
- Inline variable that is immediately returned (
inline-immediately-returned-variable) - Replace if statement with if expression (
assign-if-exp)
Comment on lines
36
to
+41
| def get_test_frame(self, caller: List[FrameInfo]) -> int: | ||
| tmp_array = [] | ||
| for index, frame in enumerate(caller): | ||
| if self.is_test_method(frame): | ||
| tmp_array.append(index) | ||
| if tmp_array: | ||
| if tmp_array := [ | ||
| index | ||
| for index, frame in enumerate(caller) | ||
| if self.is_test_method(frame) | ||
| ]: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Function StackFrameNamer.get_test_frame refactored with the following changes:
- Use named expression to simplify assignment and conditional (
use-named-expression) - Convert for loop into list comprehension (
list-comprehension)
Comment on lines
75
to
+76
| def get_file_name(self) -> str: | ||
| class_name = "" if (self.class_name is None) else (self.class_name + ".") | ||
| class_name = "" if self.class_name is None else f'{self.class_name}.' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Function StackFrameNamer.get_file_name refactored with the following changes:
- Use f-string instead of string concatenation (
use-fstring-for-concatenation)
Sourcery Code Quality Report✅ Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.64%.
Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:
Legend and ExplanationThe emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:
The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request. Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated. We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come! Help us improve this quality report! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request #110 refactored by Sourcery.
Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it.
To incorporate these changes, you can either:
Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or
Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
the original Pull Request
Incorporate changes via command line
NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as
necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request
will be closed automatically.
See our documentation here.
Run Sourcery locally
Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:
Help us improve this pull request!