Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(redhat): add package digest for rpm #4410

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 18, 2023
Merged

feat(redhat): add package digest for rpm #4410

merged 6 commits into from
May 18, 2023

Conversation

DmitriyLewen
Copy link
Contributor

@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen commented May 16, 2023 •
edited

Description

Add package digest for rpm.

Example of work.

TODO:

  • fix tests
  • add tests for sbom

Related PRs

Checklist

  • I've read the guidelines for contributing to this repository.
  • I've followed the conventions in the PR title.
  • I've added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I've updated the documentation with the relevant information (if needed).
  • I've added usage information (if the PR introduces new options)
  • I've included a "before" and "after" example to the description (if the PR is a user interface change).

@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen changed the title feat(rpm): add package digest feat(redhat): add package digest for rpm May 16, 2023
@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen self-assigned this May 18, 2023
@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2023 10:33
@knqyf263 knqyf263 merged commit cab8569 into aquasecurity:main May 18, 2023
10 checks passed
@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen deleted the feat/rpm-package-digest branch May 19, 2023 03:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@knqyf263 knqyf263 knqyf263 approved these changes

Assignees

@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@DmitriyLewen @knqyf263