Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(java): add only valid libs from pom.properties files from jars #6164

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2024
Merged

fix(java): add only valid libs from pom.properties files from jars #6164

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 20, 2024

Conversation

DmitriyLewen
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Add only valid libs from pom.properties files from jars.

Related Discussions

Checklist

  • I've read the guidelines for contributing to this repository.
  • I've followed the conventions in the PR title.
  • I've added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I've updated the documentation with the relevant information (if needed).
  • I've added usage information (if the PR introduces new options)
  • I've included a "before" and "after" example to the description (if the PR is a user interface change).

@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen self-assigned this Feb 20, 2024
@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2024 05:56
@knqyf263 knqyf263 added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 20, 2024
Merged via the queue into aquasecurity:main with commit 8221473 Feb 20, 2024
12 checks passed
@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen deleted the fix-jar/empty-fields-in-pom-properties branch February 20, 2024 10:39
@aqua-bot aqua-bot mentioned this pull request May 29, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@knqyf263 knqyf263 knqyf263 approved these changes

Assignees

@DmitriyLewen DmitriyLewen

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@DmitriyLewen @knqyf263