AGP-104: Aragon App Mining

[lkngtn]

No description provided.

[john-light]

Let's imagine there are five apps, pot is 100k ANT as mentioned.

#1. 20k ANT
#2. 16k ANT
#3 12800 ANT
#4 10240 ANT
#5 8192 ANT

Would the balance (32768 ANT) get sent back to the AA multisig? In any case, you should mention what happens to the leftover balance of the pot.

[john-light]

bump

[john-light]

The time now is after the published deadline of October 10, 2019 at 16:00 UTC for finalizing proposals and moving them to Stage V, and this proposal has not yet been finalized. Per AGP-1, this proposal is considered to be withdrawn and this pull request will now be closed:

If you do not finalize the proposal and request to move the proposal to Stage V before Stage V is scheduled to begin, AGP Editors will consider the proposal withdrawn and close the pull request when Stage V begins.

[john-light]

The Aragon Association Board of Directors has voted to push back the ANV-4 schedule by one week. This PR is being re-opened and is included in the Community Review Period which will now last until October 17, 2019 at 16:00 UTC. Please finalize the draft and leave a comment saying "This draft is final and ready to move to Stage V" before the end of the Community Review Period if you would like this proposal to be reviewed by the Aragon Association in Stage V.

Ref: https://forum.aragon.org/t/anv-4-delay-announcement/1367

[lkngtn]

This draft is final and ready to move to Stage V

[john-light]

Some open questions not yet resolved on this PR.

[lkngtn]

This is still final. I do not see any open questions that warrant a resolution/change at this time.

[john-light]

I find this proposal to be under-specified because:

• It does not specify what happens to the balance leftover in the "pot" after apps have been paid out.

• It does not define what the "default vault" is in an organization that has multiple vaults installed and used.

As an AGP Editor I will forward this proposal to the Association for review in Stage V.

As a participant in the AGP process I advocate that this proposal be rejected for remaining under-specified. This ambiguity could lead to disputes later that could easily be prevented if the author put in the effort to fill in these blanks.

[lkngtn]

Noted. I will add though that the timing and cyclical nature of the ANVs does not allow for the type of specification necessary to reach broad consensus on the specific detail without it feeling rushed. In order to move forward in a timely fashion but with the flexibility to ensure there is time to reach broad consensus on the specific details I opted to structure the proposal so there are open questions that can be resolved during implementation. The first distribution does not occur until after the next ANV so if there is contention on any details of decided during the course of implementation they can be resolved through that process. But by approving now we can move forward with the resources to ensure that an app mining process can be initiated next quarter.