You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the consensus we have an election for storage nodes and for validation nodes. In the consensus we should not have more validation nodes than storage nodes.
In some case it is actually possible according to the amount of a transaction
Describe the solution you'd like
In the election of validation nodes, we should also verify that the number of validation nodes is <= of the storage nodes number.
In the same time, we can remove the sort by authorized nodes in the storage nodes election as this sort is overwritten by the rotating key sort just after
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the problem you discovered
In the consensus we have an election for storage nodes and for validation nodes. In the consensus we should not have more validation nodes than storage nodes.
In some case it is actually possible according to the amount of a transaction
Describe the solution you'd like
In the election of validation nodes, we should also verify that the number of validation nodes is <= of the storage nodes number.
In the same time, we can remove the sort by authorized nodes in the storage nodes election as this sort is overwritten by the rotating key sort just after
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: