Improve consumed input #1415
Merged
Improve consumed input #1415
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Neylix
force-pushed
the
Improve-consumed-input
branch
from
eba1827
to
9e700e6
Compare
bchamagne
reviewed
Feb 5, 2024
| end | ||
| end | ||
|
|
||
| defp optimize_inputs_to_consume(inputs, _, _) when length(inputs) == 1, do: inputs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: you may pattern match [input]
lib/archethic/transaction_chain/transaction/validation_stamp/ledger_operations.ex
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bchamagne
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2024
Neylix
merged commit 63047ad
into
archethic-foundation:enhance_utxo_with_consumed_inputs
1 check passed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Update unspent output to match consumed inputs during AEIP 21 phase 1 (do not recreate an utxo if it is the same a an previous one)
Optimize consumed inputs to not consume an UTXO that would be consolidated alone
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Unit test
Checklist: