Add buning address to io storage nodes only if burning is intentionna…

[netboz]

…l (#711)

Description

Store burning fee movements only if they are intentionnals

Fixes # (issue)

• Now checking if the burning node address is part of the transaction movement list's recipients, to guess if fee burning was intentionnal. If not intentionnal, remove the burning address from resolved io storage nodes

• kept the test wich will add the burning address to the transaction movements if some burning movements have been recorded from point above.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested?

test coming soon

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

[samuelmanzanera]

I think you can also remove this part as it's useless now

https://github.com/archethic-foundation/archethic-node/blob/develop/lib/archethic/account/mem_tables_loader.ex#L99-L118

[Neylix]

It's ok for me, just need to fix the error on compilation due to unused aliases, and dialyzer issue with the fee variable not used anymore in the mem_table_loader.
There's also a conflict with develop branch, doing a rebase should resolve this conflict