New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add GitLab to PR generator for applicationset #9264
Conversation
afcacbc
to
01a7b95
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #9264 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 45.73% 45.75% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 220 221 +1
Lines 26006 26046 +40
==========================================
+ Hits 11893 11917 +24
- Misses 12456 12469 +13
- Partials 1657 1660 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
a0bdba6
to
c282d0b
Compare
c282d0b
to
1daf14d
Compare
Signed-off-by: Ivo Verberk <ivo.verberk@gmail.com>
1daf14d
to
347bf29
Compare
}, nil | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (g *GitLabService) List(ctx context.Context) ([]*PullRequest, error) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks
LGTM!! , just a nitpick if u feel to change then do it
Document the functions and change this function name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've kept the function name consistent with the existing pull request services (Github, gitea, bitbucket, etc.). What would you suggest in terms of an alternative name?
Is there any ETA for this feature? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one small nit. :-)
@RuBiCK by default, this would end up in 2.5. If you need it in 2.4, I can check with folks about cherry-picking it back. |
@crenshaw-dev that is what we need to create ephemeral environments. |
@RuBiCK I'll bring it up in the contributor meeting today. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xkoFkVviB70YBzSEa4bDnu-rUZ1sIFtwKKG1Uw8XsY8/edit |
@RuBiCK the consensus from the contributors is that we should protect the RC and save this feature for 2.5. If you need this feature super soon, it should be easy enough to cherry-pick onto a custom build. |
@crenshaw-dev thanks for bringing that up in the meeting, I really appreciate it. In the beginning, I thought it was an undocumented feature because it's mentioned in the documentation and I thought It would be already included and documented for 2.4. In my company, we do not program in GO and I'm not a developer, but I'll try to find someone to help me build this version because It's crucial for the company this feature to adopt Argocd. |
Ah yep, we need to remove that. I'm not sure how it got there. The basic steps of building this internally are:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Signed-off-by: Ivo Verberk <ivo.verberk@gmail.com>
Closes #9262
Note on DCO:
If the DCO action in the integration test fails, one or more of your commits are not signed off. Please click on the Details link next to the DCO action for instructions on how to resolve this.
Checklist: