docs: Sustainability effort (Incentive system)

[juliev0]

Fixes #12229

Motivation

Current Reviewers and Approvers are struggling to review all of the incoming PRs, and contributors are frustrated that their PRs aren't getting seen. There are a small number of active Reviewers and Approvers, which creates risk long term as well as company priorities change and there's employee turnover.

Also, high priority bugs aren't getting addressed.

The thought is that an incentive system could increase the level of activity for both and help turn Argo Workflows into a more sustainable system.

Verification

I'd like to get many eyeballs on this. For anyone that might be interested, please consider the terms and provide feedback if it doesn't seem right. Thank you!

[terrytangyuan]

Thank you for driving this! I like the tangible list of items for contributors to participate!

[juliev0]

@shuangkun you mentioned in the original issue that you'd be interested in participating in this. Do the terms laid out here seem okay to you?

[shuangkun]

@shuangkun you mentioned in the original issue that you'd be interested in participating in this. Do the terms laid out here seem okay to you?

It‘s okay for me. I am interested in getting more involved in community-related work.

[juliev0]

@shuangkun you mentioned in the original issue that you'd be interested in participating in this. Do the terms laid out here seem okay to you?

It‘s okay for me. I am interested in getting more involved in community-related work.

Great, in that case I've added you to the PR.

[agilgur5]

Primarily lots of stylistic changes, though a few structural points, such as moving some sections into the Contributing docs as they are not specific to the Incentive System

feat: Sustainability effort (Incentive system)

Also this would be a docs: PR

[terrytangyuan]

Should we just call this something like triaging/maintenance guidelines instead of sustainability effort?

[terrytangyuan]

LGTM. Thank you for driving this effort!

[agilgur5]

Few small comments, otherwise LGTM

[agilgur5]

Suggested change

If you are interested in formally joining the Argo project, [create a Membership request](https://github.com/argoproj/argoproj/issues/new?template=membership.md&title=REQUEST%3A%20New%20membership%20for%20%3Cyour-GH-handle%3E) in the [argoproj](https://github.com/argoproj/argoproj) repository as described in the [Membership](https://github.com/argoproj/argoproj/blob/main/community/membership.md) guide.

If you are interested in formally joining the Argo project, [create a Membership request](https://github.com/argoproj/argoproj/issues/new?template=membership.md&title=REQUEST%3A%20New%20membership%20for%20%3Cyour-GH-handle%3E) in the [`argoproj` repository](https://github.com/argoproj/argoproj) as described in the [Membership](https://github.com/argoproj/argoproj/blob/main/community/membership.md) guide.

we could put argoproj in backticks, and then we could remove it from the .spelling. nbd either way though, up to you

[juliev0]

I'll just leave as is

[agilgur5]

Also I still think we should change the PR title prefix from feat: to docs:

[agilgur5]

I think the docs build is failing because the two relative links its erroring on are outside of the docs/ folder. So we'll have to make those absolute links I guess

[juliev0]

I think the docs build is failing because the two relative links its erroring on are outside of the docs/ folder. So we'll have to make those absolute links I guess

Thanks for figuring out the cause. I'll make them absolute.

[agilgur5]

🚀 Great work on this Julie! Lots of great improvements to the Contributing docs here plus the incentive system 🙂

[juliev0]

🚀 Great work on this Julie! Lots of great improvements to the Contributing docs here plus the incentive system 🙂

thanks for the doc improvements!