Replace R code by Notebook

[terrymyc]

No description provided.

[J535D165]

Thanks @terrymyc! Thanks for your contribution.

A couple of additions and remarks are listed below:

Exclude 4 more papers

~Based on the paper, the team excluded 4 more papers. 34 of the 38 papers were described in the paper. The papers listed below have to be excluded (isn't it? @Rensvandeschoot @GerbrichFerdinands ): ~

• Sterling, M., Hendrikz, J., & Kenardy, J. (2010). Compensation claim lodgement and health outcome developmental trajectories following whiplash injury: A prospective study. Pain, 150(1), 22-28.
• Hou, W. K., Law, C. C., Yin, J., & Fu, Y. T. (2010). Resource Loss, Resource Gain, and Psychological Resilience and Dysfunction Following Cancer Diagnosis: A Growth Mixture Modeling Approach. Health Psychology, 29(5), 484-495. doi:10.1037/a0020809
• Mason, S. T., Corry, N., Gould, N. F., Amoyal, N., Gabriel, V., Wiechman-Askay, S., . . . Fauerbach, J. A. (2010). Growth curve trajectories of distress in burn patients. Journal of Burn Care and Research, 31(1), 64-72. doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181cb8ee6
• Pérez, S., Conchado, A., Andreu, Y., Galdón, M. J., Cardeña, E., Ibáñez, E., & Durá, E. (2016). Acute stress trajectories 1 year after a breast cancer diagnosis. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24(4), 1671-1678. doi:10.1007/s00520-015-2960-x

Connect to RIS files on OSF

The RIS files are now available on OSF. Can you connect them to your code and remove the ones in the Github repository?

Count duplicates

Thanks for your statistics so far. Can you count the number of duplicate items as well? Please don't make things too complicated, count check of duplicate abstracts for example.

It turns out that @qubixes is also doing some work on the dataset statistics. This is implemented in an extension for asreview https://github.com/asreview/asreview-statistics. It might be interesting to have a look. It would be nice to integrate the functionality with this repo (not for now).

[terrymyc]

There is a discrepancy in the process between this dataset and Wilson dataset. For this dataset, 8 papers are directly included after abstract screening without full-text screening, whereas the Wilson dataset does not. So, the inclusion indicators are different in two datasets. Should we have a unified criteria for this?

[J535D165]

For this dataset, 8 papers are directly included after abstract screening without full-text screening

Good point. For now, I don't have an idea to unify this. I think we should consider these as "included after full-text reading", as we do in other datasets.

[J535D165]

@Rensvandeschoot decided to continue with the 38 inclusions. This means that the citation is incorrect. @GerbrichFerdinands can you drop the correct link to the paper here?

[J535D165]

This also means that the RIS files are stored in the wrong repository on OSF. @terrymyc, please wait till the files are moved to the correct repository. @Rensvandeschoot

[GerbrichFerdinands]

Nice work Terry! ✨
Your code is very readable. I attached a few suggestions for improvement!

[GerbrichFerdinands]

I get 766!

[terrymyc]

I changed the statistics to summarize the missingness based on a clean dataset instead of dataset with duplicates. So, it becomes even less than 766.

[GerbrichFerdinands]

@Rensvandeschoot decided to continue with the 38 inclusions. This means that the citation is incorrect. @GerbrichFerdinands can you drop the correct link to the paper here?

@J535D165

Rens van de Schoot, Marit Sijbrandij, Sonja D. Winter, Sarah Depaoli & Jeroen K. Vermunt (2017) The GRoLTS-Checklist: Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24:3, 451-467, DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1247646

[J535D165]

@terrymyc Can you update the citation?