-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GKEStartPodOperatorAsync #347
GKEStartPodOperatorAsync #347
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you very much for starting this PR ❤️ , do let us know if you would like any help getting it across the line
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #347 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 96.78% 96.78% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 56 56
Lines 2925 2924 -1
==========================================
- Hits 2831 2830 -1
Misses 94 94
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add an example DAG and tests similar to https://github.com/astronomer/astronomer-providers/blob/main/tests/cncf/kubernetes/operators/test_kubernetes_pod.py please.
Do let us know if you want to take it from here
In the airflow repo, the sync version of this operator has file name |
Can you please add the relevant description for this PR? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine to me can you address one more comment on the example DAG
astronomer/providers/google/cloud/operators/kubernetes_engine.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Phani Kumar <94376113+phanikumv@users.noreply.github.com>
LGTM. Let's merge this PR, Example DAG we will address in separate PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Congrats @raphaelauv on your first merged PR
Hi @raphaelauv How did you test it? I'm trying to run it but it is failing, tracking my investigation here #390 |
close : #177