865 the hook needs to contain similar kwargs as the google providers

[erdos2n]

I have added the location parameter in the hook. I do think this needs to get upgraded to integrate the use_legacy_sql parameter, as well, but that change may not be so simple given it could change the requirements.txt.

[pankajastro]

LGTM

[rajaths010494]

rebase once the PR gets merged #867
and mypy issue should be resolved

[phanikumv]

could you please add this additional param to example DAG as well?

[pankajastro]

FYI: Look like google async lib have some issue with non us location apache/airflow#29307

[erdos2n]

One of the errors, currently, is a permission issue. It would make sense that it's a region issue, but I haven't verified for sure, since it's not my service-account.

We should include this and just update the docs to reflect a possible issue with non-US locations.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 98.61% // Head: 98.61% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (3b7ebdb) compared to base (b58089d).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #866   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.61%   98.61%           
=======================================
  Files          89       89           
  Lines        4987     4987           
=======================================
  Hits         4918     4918           
  Misses         69       69           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...nomer/providers/google/cloud/operators/bigquery.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[pankajastro]

could you please add this additional param to example DAG as well?

We have an example here using location param https://github.com/astronomer/astronomer-providers/blob/main/astronomer/providers/google/cloud/example_dags/example_bigquery_impersonation_chain.py#L92 do you mean something else?

[rajaths010494]

Can we fix the failing tests as well? If you need any help with tests do let us know.

[erdos2n]

I've gone ahead and removed the use_legacy_sql kwarg from this PR since it was failing the tests. I think it's best to open another issue for this, as the current issue with the location kwarg is breaking a DAG for a customer. I will open a new, much more broad issue for update the bigquery.py file to meet the current kwargs of the provider package.

[rajaths010494]

Can you rebase the branch?
There are mypy issues also if can resolve them.