Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request approval to contribute IBM MQ AsyncAPI binding #48

Closed
rcoppen opened this issue Jan 25, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Request approval to contribute IBM MQ AsyncAPI binding #48

rcoppen opened this issue Jan 25, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@rcoppen
Copy link
Collaborator

rcoppen commented Jan 25, 2021

Hi, I work in the IBM MQ development team and would like to contribute an AsyncAPI binding for IBM MQ under Apache 2.0 license. We’re very keen to help our users benefit from AsyncAPI and following an initial discussion with @fmvilas we have created a bindings file to help achieve that. I've opened this issue to engage with the wider community and work towards making the binding generally available under asyncapi/bindings.

Please can you advise next steps.

@github-actions
Copy link

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue.

Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@fmvilas
Copy link
Member

fmvilas commented Jan 25, 2021

Hey Richard! Thanks for opening the issue. Do you have something to share? If you've done some work already, feel free to open a PR on github.com/asyncapi/bindings (btw, I'm moving this issue there right after this comment). If you haven't done any initial work yet, feel free to share here what's on your mind or how do you think the IBM MQ binding could look like.

Happy to assist you further :)

@fmvilas fmvilas transferred this issue from asyncapi/spec Jan 25, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue.

Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@rcoppen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rcoppen commented Jan 25, 2021

Hi @fmvilas, yes we've developed a binding for IBM MQ and ready to contribute for review. I'll go ahead and open a PR.

Thanks

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴
It will be closed in 60 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with detailed explanation.
Thank you for your contributions ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Mar 27, 2021
@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Mar 29, 2021

It is already done and merged so closing the issue

@derberg derberg closed this as completed Mar 29, 2021
@derberg derberg removed the stale label Mar 29, 2021
derberg pushed a commit to asyncapi/spec that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2021
Added protocol constant that was defined in
asyncapi/bindings#52

Contributes to: asyncapi/bindings#48

Signed-off-by: Dale Lane <dale.lane@uk.ibm.com>
derberg pushed a commit to asyncapi/spec-json-schemas that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2021
Added protocol constant that was defined in
asyncapi/bindings#52

Contributes to: asyncapi/bindings#48

Signed-off-by: Dale Lane <dale.lane@uk.ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants