Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version 3 doesn't exist #35

Closed
Bilge opened this issue May 11, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Version 3 doesn't exist #35

Bilge opened this issue May 11, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Bilge
Copy link

Bilge commented May 11, 2018

The documentation claims: Add to composer.json: "athari/yalinqo": "^3.0". However, version 3 does not exist.

  • The requested package athari/yalinqo ^3 exists as athari/yalinqo[dev-master, 2.x-dev, v1.0.0.0, v1.0.1.0, v1.0.1.1, v1.0.x-dev, v1.1.0.0, v1.1.1, v1.1.2, v2.0.0.0, v2.0.x-dev, v2.1.0.0, v2.2.0.0, v2.3.0.0, v2.3.1, v2.4.0, v2.4.1] but these are rejected by your constraint.
@Athari
Copy link
Owner

Athari commented May 11, 2018

You should use ^2.0. I'm currently developing v3.0 in the master branch. It's early pre-alpha and no tagged releases exist yet. The problem is, there's no way to tell GitHub to show ReadMe of the stable 2.0 branch. I guess I'll have to revert changes to ReadMe in the meantime.

@Athari Athari self-assigned this May 11, 2018
@Athari Athari added the type:bug Bug label May 11, 2018
@Bilge
Copy link
Author

Bilge commented May 11, 2018

May I suggest you don't work in master. Work on a feature branch and merge 3.0 when it's ready.

@Athari
Copy link
Owner

Athari commented May 11, 2018

@Bilge Less branches, less problems. YaLinqo's history is very linear, I'm the only actual developer, and I'm not going to pretend otherwise. The only reason I created branches for major versions is that third-party services require updates to their configs. YaLinqo has no bugs, no feature reqeusts, no pull requests, no nothing. If it ever changes, I may reconsider my approach.

Anyway, fixed ReadMe.

@Athari Athari closed this as completed May 11, 2018
@Bilge
Copy link
Author

Bilge commented May 11, 2018

I fail to see how anything you just mentioned is in any way relevant. If your approach was perfect this issue wouldn't exist.

@Athari
Copy link
Owner

Athari commented May 11, 2018

@Bilge I don't see any issues. The only issue is that I updated ReadMe too early. Branching is irrelevant.

@Athari Athari added the resolved:done Done label Mar 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants