Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mode/prompt-buffer: Add delete-backwards-word vi keybinding #3194

Conversation

MaxGyver83
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Add missing delete-backwards-word vi keybinding to prompt-buffer.

Discussion

Not much to discuss:

db delete from cursor to previous start of word

vim help

Checklist:

Everything in this checklist is required for each PR. Please do not approve a PR that does not have all of these items.

  • Git hygiene:

    • I have pulled from master before submitting this PR
    • There are no merge conflicts.
  • My code follows the style guidelines for Common Lisp code. See:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.

  • My code has been reviewed by at least one peer. (The peer review to approve a PR counts. The reviewer must download and test the code.)

  • Documentation:

    • All my code has docstrings and :documentations written in the aforementioned style. (It's OK to skip the docstring for really trivial parts.)
    • I have updated the existing documentation to match my changes.
    • I have commented my code in hard-to-understand areas.
    • I have updated the changelog.lisp with my changes if it's anything user-facing (new features, important bug fix, compatibility breakage).
      • Changelog update should be a separate commit.
    • I have added a migration.lisp entry for all compatibility-breaking changes.
    • (If this changes something about the features showcased on Nyxt website) I have these changes described in the new/existing article at Nyxt website or will notify one of maintainters to do so.
  • Compilation and tests:

    • My changes generate no new warnings.
    • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. (If possible.)
    • I ran the tests locally ((asdf:test-system :nyxt) and (asdf:test-system :nyxt/gi-gtk)) and they pass.

@aadcg aadcg merged commit adfa65d into atlas-engineer:master Sep 28, 2023
2 checks passed
@aadcg
Copy link
Member

aadcg commented Sep 28, 2023

@MaxGyver83, thank you for your interest! Your feedback and thoughts are always appreciated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants