Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2022. It is now read-only.

Spell check only comments and text strings in c++ files #126

Open
krzychb opened this issue Apr 15, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Spell check only comments and text strings in c++ files #126

krzychb opened this issue Apr 15, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@krzychb
Copy link

krzychb commented Apr 15, 2016

Expanding on #118 I have similar issue with spell check of source.cpp files.

The problem is that spell check flags function calls, class names, include file names, variable names, etc. This is not expected behavior of spell checker working with c++ (or pure c) code.

Desired functionality would be to ignore all c code and spell check only comments and text strings.

I believe that there are other Atom users and c programmers interested in similar enhancement. If so, then please provide your comments to convince Atom development team to get it implemented.

I am happy to submit this enhancement request.
I wish Atom team and users no any issues with atom/spell-check 😄 👍

Krzysztof

spelcheck-cpp

@ludus-leonis
Copy link

I have a similar issue with LaTeX files. Instead of a C-only fix, I would propose adding a user-option to spell-check's options/preferences to toggle checking of language-dependent, highlighted keywords/strings.

@auzias
Copy link

auzias commented Aug 17, 2016

Same here, it would be great to ignore language specific keywords.

@metasean
Copy link

related to #19 (which I would vote up but it's locked because people were making +1 comments - now that github supports emoji's it would be nice to have that one unlocked so (a) dups like this and #118 don't keep being opened and (b) developers can better gauge community desires)

@ahogen
Copy link

ahogen commented Jul 31, 2017

now that github supports emoji's it would be nice to have that one unlocked so (a) dups like this and #118 don't keep being opened and (b) developers can better gauge community desires)

Sounds like a poll to me. Should be able to lock comments but allow a poll to proceed in the issue, like you say, to gauge community interest.

@metasean
Copy link

metasean commented Aug 8, 2017

@ahogen - If there's a poll, then folks shouldn't need to make +1 comments, in which case comments shouldn't have to be locked down in the first place, and if comments aren't locked down then when someone genuinely needs to make a comment (for example, indicating overlap with another issue or feature request) then they could do so.

Polls are good and have their purpose, likewise, having the ability to comment is good and has its purposes.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants