Use dynamic VRAM address in DMA display copy for fx-CG 50 compatibility #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Nothing much really, the VRAM address is different and the original asynchronous DMA-based function from WikiPrizm hardcodes the Prizm address. Use the dynamically-detected address instead.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The VRAM address is different on the fx-CG 50. The code already determines the address dynamically, however the non-blocking DMA function from WikiPrizm does not. Just use the dynamic address and the add-in rolls easily on the fx-CG 50/Graph 90+E.