Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*Burner wallet* and naming #22

Open
drhus opened this issue Nov 11, 2018 · 13 comments
Open

*Burner wallet* and naming #22

drhus opened this issue Nov 11, 2018 · 13 comments

Comments

@drhus
Copy link

drhus commented Nov 11, 2018

I personally like Burner Wallet name but I've learned the hard way to look at things through the eyes of the audience

the Q. is how "burner wallet" as a name would convey a user-friendly, seamless, trustworthy experience? do you wanna consider something else? maybe

  • Web wallet
  • Flat wallet, feeless wallet
  • IO Wallet
  • or Instant Wallet << my favorite
@austintgriffith
Copy link
Owner

This should be an open discussion and I'd love to hear more from the community.

The reason we chose "burner" was it is a little scary and that is the point.

We want the user to understand it is ephemeral and they should be a little bit afraid of that... understanding that they could lose the value backed by the PK.

@drhus
Copy link
Author

drhus commented Nov 12, 2018

w/ auto-refund #18 after a certain time elapsed the chances that the burner wallet would actually burn would approach zero :p

@pi0neerpat
Copy link

  • Temporary Wallet
  • To-Go Wallet
  • Go wallet
  • On-the-go wallet
  • Snap-wallet 👌 "here and gone in a snap!"

@drhus
Copy link
Author

drhus commented Nov 13, 2018 via email

@seichris
Copy link

Crypto Cash wallet - Relating to cash might be best to describe the features of the wallet for a non-crypto user.

@dbe
Copy link
Collaborator

dbe commented Nov 17, 2018

  • One-Off Wallet
  • Quick Card
  • Web Wallet
  • Web Cred(it)

@crn-maximizer
Copy link

Go Wallet +1

Snap is no good because it could be confused with SnapChat. You'll get in legal trouble.

I would also suggest "Change" wallet. That has several dimensions of interpretability (e.g. "change your wallet" and "wallet for pocket change").

I think a rebranding is highly desirable and would go a long way towards helping Burner Wallet reach a larger audience. I think a project like this could easily be a mainstream service with global reach. But it needs to be rebranded to a more friendly name. "Burner Wallet" is too aggressive and far to associated with criminals.

@pi0neerpat
Copy link

fannypack-best
nifty-fannypack

Fanny packs are a fun place to keep a little bit of change when you're on-the-go.

@pi0neerpat
Copy link

fanny-tshirt
Made T-shirts for promo launch party

@johngrantuk
Copy link
Contributor

As a heads up 'fanny' has quite a different meaning here in the UK. Personally I actually like Burner Wallet.

@marczeller
Copy link
Contributor

I asked a dozen people yesterday during a meetup :

  1. People are fine with "Burner Wallet"

  2. Instant Wallet is also appreciated

@hughlang
Copy link

hughlang commented Feb 28, 2019

@austintgriffith, nice talking to you yesterday. Naming things is one of my favorite things, so here's my suggestion:

Flash Pay

Rationale:

  • It still retains a bit of the "burner"/fire concept. Current art can hold for now.
  • It also suggests "fast" and "quick" and not meant for large sums.
  • The name should be usable as a verb, like "Venmo it to me" => "FlashPay me", "Flash me some xdai", etc
  • Possible variants: Flash Wallet, FlashPay Wallet

Edit: A quick google search found this: https://www.netspend.com/flashpay/

@elpinguinofrio
Copy link

I really like burner wallet name. Sounds amazing, neat logo, easy to remember, people already recognize it, you can even use cool emoji for it.

troggy pushed a commit to troggy/burner-wallet that referenced this issue Jul 26, 2019
* Add basic info and addresses

* fix formatting
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants