Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(predictions): add implementation for no light support #3618

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

thisisabhash
Copy link
Member

Issue #

None

Description

Add implementation for no light support

General Checklist

  • Added new tests to cover change, if needed
  • Build succeeds with all target using Swift Package Manager
  • All unit tests pass
  • All integration tests pass
  • Security oriented best practices and standards are followed (e.g. using input sanitization, principle of least privilege, etc)
  • Documentation update for the change if required
  • PR title conforms to conventional commit style
  • New or updated tests include Given When Then inline code documentation and are named accordingly testThing_condition_expectation()
  • If breaking change, documentation/changelog update with migration instructions

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@thisisabhash thisisabhash requested a review from a team as a code owner April 16, 2024 21:46
components?.queryItems = [
URLQueryItem(name: "session-id", value: sessionID),
URLQueryItem(name: "challenge-versions", value: "FaceMovementAndLightChallenge_1.0.0"),
URLQueryItem(name: "precheck-view-enabled", value: options.preCheckViewEnabled ? "1":"0"),
URLQueryItem(name: "attempt-id", value: options.viewId),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should attempt-id get changed to view-id?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added a Todo to revisit this - pending confirmation

@thisisabhash thisisabhash merged commit 0148783 into add-public-defs Apr 17, 2024
74 checks passed
@thisisabhash thisisabhash deleted the no-light-implementation branch April 17, 2024 20:31
thisisabhash added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2024
…ort (#3617)

* feat(predictions): add public definitions for no light challenge support

* Add missing files

* fix swiftlint issue

* feat(predictions): add implementation for no light support (#3618)

* feat(predictions): add implementation for no light support

* fix swiftlint issue

* address review comments

* address review comments

* address review comments
thisisabhash added a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2024
…ort (#3617)

* feat(predictions): add public definitions for no light challenge support

* Add missing files

* fix swiftlint issue

* feat(predictions): add implementation for no light support (#3618)

* feat(predictions): add implementation for no light support

* fix swiftlint issue

* address review comments

* address review comments

* address review comments
thisisabhash added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2024
…ort (#3617)

* feat(predictions): add public definitions for no light challenge support

* Add missing files

* fix swiftlint issue

* feat(predictions): add implementation for no light support (#3618)

* feat(predictions): add implementation for no light support

* fix swiftlint issue

* address review comments

* address review comments

* address review comments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants