Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Determine pricing for ACH debits #47

Closed
matin opened this issue Aug 29, 2012 · 19 comments
Closed

Determine pricing for ACH debits #47

matin opened this issue Aug 29, 2012 · 19 comments

Comments

@matin
Copy link
Member

matin commented Aug 29, 2012

To complete #2, Balanced has to determine an appropriate price for ACH debits.

@matin
Copy link
Member Author

matin commented Aug 29, 2012

Current proposal is $1 fixed (no variable) for ACH debits.

ACH credits will remain 25¢.

@rmanisha
Copy link

rmanisha commented Sep 4, 2012

How about a percentage with a $1 cap? Could work better for smaller transactions.

@matin
Copy link
Member Author

matin commented Sep 11, 2012

@rmanisha Balanced pays a fixed fee regardless of the transaction size. There could be a business justification to implement such a loss leader, but this can be revisited

@matin
Copy link
Member Author

matin commented Sep 11, 2012

Finalizing on $1 for ACH debits.

@matin matin closed this as completed Sep 11, 2012
@jkwade
Copy link

jkwade commented Sep 19, 2012

ACH rejection pricing discussed at #91.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

I'm late to this conversation, but the $1 fee puts this at $24 break-even with credit card pricing (2.9% + $0.30). Do I have that right? That's less compelling for my use case, which is for the most part $10 transactions.

@matin
Copy link
Member Author

matin commented Sep 21, 2012

You have it right, but you have a different use case from most of the people that emailed me. You will have lower transaction sized, but you should also have a larger number of transactions, which is where volume pricing (#57) comes in.

@quellhorst
Copy link

Regarding the fees for ACH debits. In the use cases I run into 1% + $.30 could work unless it is higher dollar amounts i.e. > $500. Maybe you could do some type of cap or tier for the charge?

I'd like to mention https://www.dwolla.com/fees ... They charge $0 for payments under $10 and $.25 to receive > $10.

@chourobin
Copy link

+1 for a cap on larger transactions

@ithielnor
Copy link

A cap of $5 seems extremely high for my use case. My average debit is between $100-$250. Other ACH processor I've found would charge under $1.50 for these, but with the 1%+0.30 model I break even at $120.

If the cap were changed to $1 ($1.30 w/fixed) then this would be an enticing offering. Thoughts?

@jkwade
Copy link

jkwade commented Nov 5, 2013

Hey @ithielnor with 1% + 30¢ you'd pay $2.05 to move $175. How much are you planning to charge your customers? Are you planning to charge a fixed fee only (i.e. $1.50)?

@ithielnor
Copy link

My client's average charge is $220. They currently get a rate of $1.25 per transaction. I think I could convince them to switch as long as their per transaction fee were not over $1.50.

@jkwade
Copy link

jkwade commented Nov 6, 2013

hey @ithielnor we understand the $5 cap doesn't work for everyone, but we heard from many of our existing customers that it does, while still giving Balanced enough upside to merit supporting this technology at the time. My CEO/co-founder, @matin, explains in this comment that the $5 is the current cap, but we're planning to reduce the cost to a fixed fee over time.

Why are you not interested in using the other ACH service you mention that offers $1.25 instead of Balanced?

@ithielnor
Copy link

I'd like to use Balanced because you offer tokenized transactions (reduced PCI requirements), much better APIs, marketplace escrow, and the potential to also us Credit Card processing through the same API. In short, you guys offer a compelling feature set.

Basically there are two players in the payments market that I like, Balanced, and Stripe. Stripe does not offer ACH at this time (though I've been told by their devs it is "on the roadmap"). There's not much difference in price for CC, but your escrow features and ACH would be the winning factors for Balanced if only ACH were economical for large transactions. Integrating with another vendor is yet another API to integrate with, and potentially increased PCI requirements.

I'll keep an eye on your prices but for now I'm afraid I will have to choose another vendor.

@matin
Copy link
Member Author

matin commented Nov 6, 2013

@ithielnor: We plan to continue lowering the price. So far, we've reduced the price from 1% + 30¢ by adding a $15 cap and then a $5 cap. That trend will continue.

@jkwade
Copy link

jkwade commented Jan 9, 2014

Volume pricing discounts for ACH Debits being discussed on #473

@rmanisha
Copy link

@matin @jkwade I'd like to re-open this issue for discussion. Would it be possible for us to move to a fixed price for ACH debits?

@msu03
Copy link

msu03 commented Jun 24, 2014

@martin @jkwade you guys have built an awesome product. Any update on the ACH cap? I want use it to collect rent which will be large transactions so in interested in a lower cap. Thanks!

@rmanisha
Copy link

@msu03 can you email me at manisha@balancedpayments.com?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants