adding some notes

notes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+
+This book is about the variable and changing ways that geographers
+have answered the question "what is geography?," and the contextual
+factors that help explain those answers. It is about the
+back-and-forth between world, and a changing discipline. Perhaps most
+importantly, it is about *you*: learning how to place yourself in
+this evolving world of ideas.
+
+# Disciplines and the Modern Academy
+
+# Geography of Empire
+
+# A Modern Discipline
+
+# Heterodox Geography
+

tools.md

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+
+% Tools for Academic Literature Review and Analysis
+
+# Tools
+
+Keeping track, and making sense of, one or more academic literatures
+is a difficult task greatly helped up electronic tools: most notably
+research databases and bibliographic managers. I present here how to use
+both of them here, with a particular focus on my tool of choice:
+Zotero. Feel free to use any tool you like, but I choose to
+demonstrate Zotero because it:
+
+1. has all the features we need
+2. allows your data to be synced to the cloud, and so available on
+different computers
+3. is completely free; no cost and open source
+4. is cross-platform and application, and so works equally well
+whether you use Windows, Mac OS, or Linux for an operating system, or
+OpenOffice.org or Microsoft Word for your word-processing.
+
+We have already reviewed that the task of analyzing a little consists
+of the following steps:
+
+1. identifying relevant keywords
+2. gathering references
+3. reading sources and categorizing them
+4. describing the connections among the different groupings
+
+We will thus operationalize these steps using Zotero.
+
+# Identifying Keywords
+
+Here we first have to figure out what it is we are trying to describe.
+
+# Gathering References
+
+Here we will use two journal databases, and Google Scholar, to find as
+many relevant references as we can. 
+
+Once we find these references, we want to quickly suck the relevant
+metadata into Zotero for later reuse. we thus simply click the button
+in the toolbar, and Zotero will save the information.
+
+Once we are done collecting the references we can make a quick first
+pass by tagging each item consistently based on what we can tell from
+the abstract and a quick glance at the article.
+
+Now that we have everything properly tagged, we want to identify key
+readings for further analysis. We might want to prioritize those
+readings that have two characteristics:
+
+1. roughly 3-7 years old 
+2. relatively high citation counts (greater
+than 20 or so in Google Scholar is good; more than 50 is ideal)
+
+More recent articles (or books) have often not been out long enough to become
+established in the literature, but older articles by definition
+exclude more recent work. So this is a good sweet spot.
+
+You can then work backward from there, observing how each article
+builds on previous work. As you read more, you will start to recognize
+pattens of citation: this article gets cited when an author wants to
+make X point, and another article when they want to make Y
+point. Recognizing these patterns is essential to understanding a
+literature. 
+
+In the end, we want a handful of collections that describe different
+areas of our literature. We want each collection to have roughly ten
+examples, and for each of them to have a clear statement about why
+they are there, and what their significance is. At this point, we can
+ask Zotero to generate a report for us.
+
+Once we have this, we can start work on our papers. Each collection
+should ideally map onto a section heading, and each article should get
+cited in that section.