You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Actually in case we will take std as $\frac{1}{\sqrt{nev}}$ such calculation looks strange because of scale doesn't match.
For sure it is not correct. Here we have typical Poisson distribution (large numbers of events and small probability) i.e. $\lambda=np$, but $p=\frac{n_g}{n}$ and this means that $\sigma=n_g$
Perhaps, we have to normalize the data. In this case we can see flat curve(last picture)
Also we shouldn't normalize this data but we have to change luminosity scale. I multiply all luminosities by 1000:
Now I have number of events with$\rho'$ for each runs and I can get luminosity of these runs.
This means that I can get cross section of the$\rho'$
Obviously this should be flat. But for such definition I can't confirm that:
Actually in case we will take std as$\frac{1}{\sqrt{nev}}$ such calculation looks strange because of scale doesn't match.
Perhaps, we have to normalize the data. In this case we can see flat curve(last picture):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: