Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate CuIterator in favor of upstream implementation #8

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 12, 2020

Conversation

ararslan
Copy link
Member

@ararslan ararslan commented Apr 6, 2020

CuIterator now lives in CuArrays as of CuArrays 2.0. Flux 0.10.4 and Zygote 0.4.13 added support for CuArrays 2.

Fixes #2.

`CuIterator` now lives in CuArrays as of CuArrays 2.0. Flux 0.10.4 and
Zygote 0.4.13 added support for CuArrays 2.
@ararslan ararslan requested a review from jrevels April 6, 2020 19:18
Project.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@jrevels jrevels left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, only requested change is to make the compat bounds more strict to ensure that CuIterator will actually exist in the user's dependencies (I'm assuming this is necessary to ensure that, let me know if not)

ararslan and others added 2 commits April 12, 2020 12:48
Make the compat bounds stricter to ensure that CuIterator will actually exist in the user's dependencies

Co-Authored-By: Jarrett Revels <jarrettrevels@gmail.com>
@ararslan ararslan merged commit cf65177 into master Apr 12, 2020
@ararslan ararslan deleted the aa/update-flux branch April 12, 2020 20:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

remove CuIterator in favor of upstream implementation
2 participants