-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixes 3326 #3338
fixes 3326 #3338
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code looks good, but the changelog appears to have a rogue entry about AssumeNewUser.
id = "test", | ||
name = "test", | ||
owner = "test", | ||
source = new OptionalString(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The semantics here are that new OptionalString()
with no constructor argument is an empty optional string? That is, new OptionalString()
is the equivalent of Scalas
None`?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
correct- that is a None
@@ -6,12 +6,13 @@ The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/), | |||
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html). | |||
|
|||
## [1.19.18] | |||
### Fixed | |||
- `BeamScheduler` can deserialize jobs without a `source` field. | |||
- `AssumeNewUser` does not allow `userId` that is not a positive value |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems not-relevant to the current changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nvm, I'm bad at reading diffs. I wish GitHub had highlighted it differently.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was wrong about the rogue changelog entry. The AssumeNewUser line was already there, it just moved along with the ### Fixed
header.
fixes 3326 by not throwing exception if source doesn't exist.