Recreate the parser with scopes #1
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add more semantic meaning of functions and instructions. This allows e.g. selecting functions or arguments and context-sensitive highlighting (e.g. for a `%struct` in it's definition or usage as a type). The implementation is based on the parser implementation in llvm and the llvm language reference. The instruction tests are taken from the llvm language reference. I ran the parser on the llvm test suite (filtering out the tests that contain invalid IR) and it doesn't emit ERROR or MISSING on them.
|
Fantastic, looks great! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add more semantic meaning of functions and instructions.
This allows e.g. selecting functions or arguments and context-sensitive
highlighting (e.g. for a
%structin it's definition or usage as atype).
The implementation is based on the parser implementation in llvm and the
llvm language reference.
The instruction tests are taken from the llvm language reference.
I ran the parser on the llvm test suite (filtering out the tests that
contain invalid IR) and it doesn't emit ERROR or MISSING on them.