Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

World Joints #74

Open
methylDragon opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

World Joints #74

methylDragon opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@methylDragon
Copy link
Contributor

Should we be forcing blue to be fixed at the origin in Gazebo with the world joint?

That stops the model from being moved around which might be inconvenient if people want to simulate the robot somewhere else in a simulated world.

@wuphilipp
Copy link
Collaborator

Humm yes, that's true. Without fixing the robot to the world frame the robot tends to float away in the zero gravity world. We have the zero gravity gazebo world to simulate the control interface a user would have, where the hardware interface provides the gravity compensation.

I agree though that it is inconvenient. Maybe we can add a parameter that allows the user to choose if they want the extra joint?

@brentyi
Copy link
Collaborator

brentyi commented Jun 23, 2019

Perhaps we should move towards re-enabling gravity in the Gazebo world?
It might be a little less clean for use on the real robot, but one option would be to move the gravity compensation code from the controller manager level to the controller level.

@wuphilipp
Copy link
Collaborator

Alright sounds good. I've gone ahead and made these two pull requests which should address this.
#76
berkeleyopenarms/blue_simulator#12

Let me know what you all think!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants