Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relation to KeepaliveTime and other nits #2

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Mar 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

benmaddison
Copy link
Contributor

  • require SendHoldTime be greater than KeepAliveTime
  • nits

@benjojo
Copy link
Collaborator

benjojo commented Mar 24, 2024

Seems reasonable to me

@benjojo benjojo merged commit ada5c91 into bgp:master Mar 24, 2024
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@

<section title="Changes to BGP Timers">
<t>In Section 10 of <xref target="RFC4271"/> summarizes BGP Timers. This document adds another BGP timer: SendHoldTimer.</t>
<t>SendHoldTime is a mandatory FSM attribute that stores the initial value for the SendHoldTimer. The suggested default value for SendHoldTime is 8 minutes. An implementation MAY make it configurable.</t>
<t>SendHoldTime is a mandatory FSM attribute that stores the initial value for the SendHoldTimer. SendHoldTime MUST be greater than the value of KeepaliveTime. The suggested default value for SendHoldTime is the greater of 8 minutes or 6 times KeepaliveTime. An implementation MAY make it configurable.</t>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer if this would use HoldTime instead of KeepaliveTime. The HoldTime is negotiated while KeepaliveTime is more implementation specific.

@benmaddison benmaddison deleted the bm-nits branch May 2, 2024 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants