Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix use of locales for python et al #1011

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 11, 2017

Conversation

josephwinston
Copy link

See #1010

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 30, 2016

Current coverage is 95.97% (diff: 100%)

Merging #1011 into master will not change coverage

@@             master      #1011   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            35         35          
  Lines          1789       1789          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
  Hits           1717       1717          
  Misses           72         72          
  Partials          0          0          

Sunburst

Powered by Codecov. Last update 8fa3245...704d559

RUN apt-get update
# From http://stackoverflow.com/a/38553499

RUN apt-get update && DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get install -y locales
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@josephwinston Why did you do apt-get update and DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get install -y locales in the same line? It's not "wrong," I'm just curious if there's some reason that I don't grok.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Each command in the Dockerfile generates a new image. I grouped those commands together as one so that a single image is produced if the command succeed. This follows the general pattern found at https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining!

@sbellem is our local Docker expert and he's away on holidays for a little while longer, so don't worry if he doesn't review this PR right away.

@r-marques r-marques requested review from sbellem and removed request for r-marques January 4, 2017 15:14
@r-marques
Copy link
Contributor

This seems to be a problem in python-rapidjson python-rapidjson/python-rapidjson#52

@sbellem sbellem merged commit 8b2ae1d into bigchaindb:master Jan 11, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants