You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there some kind of roadmap on which we can work together, so we don't duplicate any efforts?
I particularly liked @jmarshall 's idea to create a gatk-slim package, similar to picard, in #41127
GATK references an environment file in its installation docs, found here. This contains a set of (ancient) dependencies, which are needed to get the GATK python scrips to work.
I would suggest we try to replicate this set of dependencies?
Any and all thoughts are welcome!
Also pinging in @nvnieuwk and @maxulysse to get the nf-core folks in the loop
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
I wanted to open a meta issue to consolidate all the efforts to actually get GATK4 to work (completely) through bioconda.
So far I've found draft PR's by
@mjsteinbaugh
@jmarshall
@ryanjameskennedy
Is there some kind of roadmap on which we can work together, so we don't duplicate any efforts?
I particularly liked @jmarshall 's idea to create a
gatk-slim
package, similar to picard, in #41127GATK references an environment file in its installation docs, found here. This contains a set of (ancient) dependencies, which are needed to get the GATK python scrips to work.
I would suggest we try to replicate this set of dependencies?
Any and all thoughts are welcome!
Also pinging in @nvnieuwk and @maxulysse to get the nf-core folks in the loop
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: