Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update bip-0173.mediawiki #543

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Update bip-0173.mediawiki #543

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Dorson
Copy link

@Dorson Dorson commented May 27, 2017

No description provided.

@luke-jr
Copy link
Member

luke-jr commented May 27, 2017

Discussions take place on the bitcoin-dev mailing list: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

With regard to the comments, note there is no such thing as a "segregated layer". Segwit is simply an improvement to Bitcoin's layer 1 (the blockchain).

@sipa I assume NACK?

@luke-jr luke-jr requested a review from sipa May 27, 2017 21:29
@sipa
Copy link
Member

sipa commented May 28, 2017

As for the comment itself, I understand the desire to make the address reflect the type of output created, but I don't think it is very important (the sender typically shouldn't care what address type the receiver uses, as long as their software supports it), and certainly less worthwhile to encode in a human-recognizable manner than the application or chain/currency type. The address type proposed has a number of unused values available (15 through 31) in the header byte which can be used for non-segwit purposes (or extensions to segwit) later.

But NACK, this is not the place to put that discussion.

@luke-jr luke-jr closed this May 28, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants