Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Orchid forked subproject and support for connecting via Tor. #1314

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2016

Conversation

schildbach
Copy link
Member

I propose to remove Orchid and with it support for connecting via Tor from bitcoinj. The feature was never really used. Those who tried reported issues and Orchid hasn't been maintained for ~3 years. On the other hand, the way how bitcoinj depends on Orchid has repeatedly caused build/dependency errors and bloats the binary size for those who do not need Tor.

If anyone wants to volunteer for the job of maintaining the Tor feature, we should find a way to plug in Orchid in a way to that the depencency is optional. I would be happy to move Orchid to a separate repository under the bitcoinj GitHub organization in this case so it can keep its home.

@Polve
Copy link

Polve commented Nov 14, 2016

I'm using bitcoinj as a library and I'm happy to get rid of orchid and related dependencies 👍

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 72.24% when pulling 8d353a5 on schildbach:remove-orchid into 34e33a1 on bitcoinj:master.

@greenaddress
Copy link

Given Orchid has little maintenance and hasn't kept up with Tor updates I agree.

It also had problems on Android and I think it stopped working with Android 6 or 7 not sure if it that was caused by some Android update and if it was then fixed as we moved to support tor via socks5 proxy and Orbot rather than using Orchid.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.5%) to 72.229% when pulling 7e609a2 on schildbach:remove-orchid into ba6e65f on bitcoinj:master.

@schildbach schildbach merged commit 7e609a2 into bitcoinj:master Nov 25, 2016
@schildbach
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for your feedback. Merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants