Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

'Invert' checkbox as default for all boolean feedback definitions #2547

Closed
2 tasks done
leonreucher opened this issue Aug 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
2 tasks done
Labels
area/backend Something in the core of companion Enhancement New feature or request Needs beer! This needs discussion while drinking beer
Milestone

Comments

@leonreucher
Copy link

Is this a feature relevant to companion itself, and not a module?

  • I believe this to be a feature for companion, not a module

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Describe the feature

For the modules I developed I added an option to invert the boolean value in all boolean feedback definitions. Probably it would be a nice idea, to implement this feature for all feedbacks which are boolean based?

Bildschirmfoto 2023-08-10 um 23 35 59

Usecases

Invert the logic for already designed buttons, without having the need to change the design.

@Julusian Julusian added Enhancement New feature or request Needs beer! This needs discussion while drinking beer area/backend Something in the core of companion labels Aug 13, 2023
@Julusian Julusian added this to the v3.1 milestone Aug 13, 2023
@Julusian
Copy link
Member

This is now in the beta builds. See #2549 for details on how it works, it has also been added to the module docs https://github.com/bitfocus/companion-module-base/wiki/Feedbacks#inverting-boolean-feedbacks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/backend Something in the core of companion Enhancement New feature or request Needs beer! This needs discussion while drinking beer
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants